Skip to content
Trial Optimization

Trial Timeline & Delay Analysis

Translate trial slippage into NPV cost.

A structured framework for analyzing trial timelines and delay drivers — for portfolio valuation, BD pricing and operational planning.

Decision angle

"How much timeline risk should we discount this asset for?"

TL;DR

Avg P3 delay 6–12 months. Each month of delay costs measurable NPV. Quantify it and prioritize operational interventions accordingly.

Trial delay is the most under-modeled variable in pharma portfolio strategy. Quantifying delay × NPV per month puts operational interventions in their proper economic context.

Key insights

What we’re seeing in the data.

01

Recruitment dominates delay risk

40%+ of trials miss recruitment plan.

02

ATMP manufacturing causes slips

Cell, gene, ADC trials face capacity-driven delay.

03

Protocol amendments compound

Each adds weeks; multiple add quarters.

6–12mo
Avg P3 delay
Industry
40%+
Miss recruitment
Industry
$M/mo
NPV cost
Asset-specific
4
Top drivers
Tracked
Decision framework

How to think about it.

  1. 01

    Map delay distribution

    TA, modality, sponsor, geo.

  2. 02

    Score per-trial risk

    Recruitment, manufacturing, protocol.

  3. 03

    Translate to NPV

    Delay × NPV per month.

  4. 04

    Plan interventions

    DCT, AI site selection, adaptive design.

Considerations

What separates a good answer from a defensible one.

Geo trade-offs

EM faster but regulatory complex.

Comparator supply

Active arm risk.

Real-time monitoring

Critical.

Sources & tools

Where the signal comes from.

ClinicalTrials.gov milestones CTMS dashboards Site-performance models Cortellis
FAQ

Common questions.

How much does a 6-mo delay cost?

For $1B peak-sales asset, often $50–150M NPV.

Can AI reduce delay?

Yes — site selection and recruitment AI demonstrably cut delays 10–30%.

Want this answered on your data?

We build decision systems on top of analyses like this — so the next question takes minutes, not weeks.

Talk to a strategist