Skip to content
Patent Expiry

Drugs Losing Exclusivity

Molecule-level cliff timing.

A defensible view of drugs losing market exclusivity 2026–2030 — molecule-level timing, geographic variance, and revenue erosion forecasts.

Decision angle

"Which specific molecules will lose exclusivity in our defense / attack window?"

TL;DR

A molecule-level exclusivity calendar with PoS-on-erosion modeling guides both defender lifecycle and biosimilar / generic entry strategy.

The 2026–2030 exclusivity-loss window is dense. Molecule-level resolution with country-specific erosion forecasts is the only credible basis for defender or challenger strategy.

Key insights

What we’re seeing in the data.

01

Molecule-level resolution required

TA-level views miss 30%+ of opportunity.

02

Erosion curves vary by molecule

Biosimilar uptake 3× faster in some markets.

03

Authorized generics shape erosion

Defender lever.

Molecule
Resolution
Required
Erosion variance
By geo
AG
Defender lever
Authorized generic
2026–30
Window
Major
Decision framework

How to think about it.

  1. 01

    Build molecule calendar

    Country-by-country.

  2. 02

    Forecast erosion curves

    Historical biosimilar / generic uptake.

  3. 03

    Model defender plays

    AG, lifecycle, formulation.

  4. 04

    Map challenger entry

    Manufacturing, regulatory, channel.

Considerations

What separates a good answer from a defensible one.

IP settlements

Can extend or compress.

Pricing rules

Reference pricing chains.

Biosimilar interchangeability

Affects switch dynamics.

Sources & tools

Where the signal comes from.

Cortellis IP FDA Orange / Purple Books PatBase EvaluatePharma
FAQ

Common questions.

How granular?

Molecule × country × indication.

Defender ROI?

Lifecycle and AG plays typically retain 40–70% of pre-cliff revenue.

Want this answered on your data?

We build decision systems on top of analyses like this — so the next question takes minutes, not weeks.

Talk to a strategist