Skip to content
Patent Expiry

Drugs Losing Exclusivity

Molecule-level cliff timing.

A defensible view of drugs losing market exclusivity 2026–2030 — molecule-level timing, geographic variance, and revenue erosion forecasts.

Decision angle

"Which specific molecules will lose exclusivity in our defense / attack window?"

TL;DR

A molecule-level exclusivity calendar with PoS-on-erosion modeling guides both defender lifecycle and biosimilar / generic entry strategy.

The 2026–2030 exclusivity-loss window is dense. Molecule-level resolution with country-specific erosion forecasts is the only credible basis for defender or challenger strategy.

Key insights

What we’re seeing in the data.

01

Molecule-level resolution required

TA-level views miss 30%+ of opportunity.

02

Erosion curves vary by molecule

Biosimilar uptake 3× faster in some markets.

03

Authorized generics shape erosion

Defender lever.

Molecule
Resolution
Required
3×
Erosion variance
By geo
AG
Defender lever
Authorized generic
2026–30
Window
Major
Decision framework

How to think about it.

  1. 01

    Build molecule calendar

    Country-by-country.

  2. 02

    Forecast erosion curves

    Historical biosimilar / generic uptake.

  3. 03

    Model defender plays

    AG, lifecycle, formulation.

  4. 04

    Map challenger entry

    Manufacturing, regulatory, channel.

Considerations

What separates a good answer from a defensible one.

✓
IP settlements

Can extend or compress.

✓
Pricing rules

Reference pricing chains.

✓
Biosimilar interchangeability

Affects switch dynamics.

Sources & tools

Where the signal comes from.

Cortellis IP FDA Orange / Purple Books PatBase EvaluatePharma
FAQ

Common questions.

How granular?

Molecule × country × indication.

Defender ROI?

Lifecycle and AG plays typically retain 40–70% of pre-cliff revenue.

Want this answered on your data?

We build decision systems on top of analyses like this — so the next question takes minutes, not weeks.

Talk to a strategist